Preview

Book. Reading. Media

Advanced search

Linguocognitive Approach to Text Analysis

https://doi.org/10.20913/BRM-1-1-3

Abstract

Cognitive sciences were officially included in the nomenclature of scientific specialties in Russia in 2021. However, the issue of the subject and method of cognitive science in general and its projection on text analysis in particular remains little known to the general scientific community. Linguistic text analysis has gone through several stages of evolution. Each of them accumulates the critical aspects highlighting the necessity to search for new approaches. There are three such approaches in linguistics: structural, communicative, cognitive. The structural paradigm made it possible to solve scientific problems using the example of simple language units. However, it was experiencing serious difficulties in studying complex emergent phenomena, to which the text belongs. Some of these difficulties were leveled by including a communicative approach in the linguist’s methodological baggage. At the same time, a significant layer of factors influencing on the meaning generation of the text remained outside the scope of the research focus. As a result, the linguocognitive approach to text analysis was formed in linguistics. This made it possible to include not only linguistic structures, but also the widest range of mental structures (concepts, frames and slots, prototypes, categories, conceptual oppositions, gestalts, mental spaces and models, conceptual metaphors, precedent phenomena, semantic networks) and cognitive operations (conceptualization, categorization, inference, causal attribution, conceptual projections, blending) in the analysis. Thus, the linguocognitive approach to text analysis increases the heuristics of scientific research due to it is aimed at studying of semantic processes as mental processes.

About the Author

E. V. Budaev
Nizhny Tagil State Social Pedagogical Institute, The Branch of the Russian State Professional Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Budaev Eduard Vladimirovich, Doctor of Philological  Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of  Foreign Languages and Russian Philology

Krasnogvardeyskaya str., 57, Nizhny Tagil, 622031



References

1. Baranov AN and Dobrovolsky DO (eds.) (2003) English-Russian dictionary of linguistics and semiotics. Moscow: Azbukovnik. (In Russ.)

2. Babenko LG and Kazarin YuV (2009) Linguistic analysis of a literary text. Theory and practice. Moscow: Flinta. (In Russ.)

3. Boldyrev NN (2019) Language and knowledge system. Cognitive theory of language. Moscow: YaSK. (In Russ.)

4. Budaev EV (2020) Cognitive method: two-level structure principle. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka 2: 168–173. (In Russ.)

5. Vygotsky LS (1934) Thinking and speech. Moscow: Sots.-ekon. izd-vo. (In Russ.)

6. Guboglo MN (2006) In the name of the language: essays on ethno-cultural and ethno-political history of the Gagauz. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

7. Alekseev AP (ed.) (2008) Brief philosophical dictionary. Moscow: TK Velbi. (In Russ.)

8. Kubryakova ES (1994) The initial stages of the formation of cognitivism: linguistics – psychology – cognitive science. Voprosy jazykoznanija 4: 3–15. (In Russ.)

9. Kubryakova ES, Demyankov VZ, Pankrats YuG and Luzina LG (1996) Brief dictionary of cognitive terms. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta. (In Russ.)

10. Kuhn T (2003) The structure of scientific revolutions. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)

11. Leont’ev AA (2003) Fundamentals of psycholinguistics. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.)

12. Lotman YuM (1996) Inside the thinking worlds. Man – text – semiosphere – history. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury. (In Russ.)

13. Maturana U and Varela F (2019) The tree of knowledge. Biological roots of human understanding. Moscow: URSS. (In Russ.)

14. Popova ZD and Sternin IA (2001) Essays on cognitive linguistics. Voronezh: Istoki. (In Russ.)

15. Skrebtsova TG (2018) Cognitive linguistics. Classical theories, new approaches. Moscow: YaSK. (In Russ.)

16. Saussure F de (2016) General linguistics course. Moscow: Librocom. (In Russ.)

17. Teliya VN (1996) Russian phraseology: semantic, pragmatic and linguoculturological aspects. Moscow: YaSK. (In Russ.)

18. Bermudez JL (2020) Cognitive science: an introduction to the science of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009064880.

19. Haselow A and Kaltenböck G (eds.) (2020) Grammar and cognition. Dualistic models of language structure and language processingig. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/hcp.70.

20. Lewis B (1991) The political language of Islam. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

21. Mody M (ed.) (2017) Neural mechanisms of language. New York: Springer.

22. van den Broek P and Kendeou P (2008) Cognitive Processes in Comprehension of Science Texts: The Role of Co-Activation in Confronting Misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22: 335–351.

23. van den Broek P, Rapp DN and Kendeou P (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist approaches in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes 39: 299–316.

24. Wen X and Taylor JR (eds.) (2021) The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics. New York: Routledge.

25. Winters ME and Nathan GS (2020) Cognitive linguistics for linguists. New York: Springer.


Review

For citations:


Budaev E.V. Linguocognitive Approach to Text Analysis. Book. Reading. Media. 2023;1(1):21-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/BRM-1-1-3

Views: 418


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-6063 (Print)